The September CPI report was clearly softer than expected, with core inflation at 0.23% M/M (consensus of 0.32) after 0.35% in August, back to the pace seen in June after two 0.3% readings.
Core goods were one notable relative weak point with markets still firmly on tariff passthrough watch, increasing 0.22% M/M (consensus 0.34) after 0.28% M/M in August, helped by a surprise decline in used car prices.
Our look at broad price pressures within the core goods basket suggests September saw a very similar picture to August, with the peak coming back in June rather than seeing any additional acceleration in tariff passthrough.
Rental inflation was surprisingly soft and included a sizeable reversal of OER inflation after a southern-based spike the prior month. Core services excluding housing were still firm however at 0.35% M/M and are now running at 4.7% annualized over three months or 3.3% over six months, but this metric has poor correlation with its PCE counterpart.
Core CPI inflation surprisingly eased back a tenth to 3.0% Y/Y after two months at 3.1%, within a 2.8-3.3% range seen since mid-2024. Three-month core CPI stands at 3.6% annualized whilst the six-month is softer at 3.0% annualized.
Data quality concerns increased again even before government shutdown collection issues, with a new recent high of 40% for different cell imputation in September – this peaked at 15% in the pandemic.
There is still no release date for the September PPI report, with Fed officials still missing a sizeable piece for core PCE tracking ahead of Wednesday’s FOMC decision.
Post-CPI, we track core PCE estimates closer to 0.25% M/M for September than the 0.30% estimated pre-CPI. That would see a third month at 2.9% Y/Y but with similar recent run rates rather than ones point to a further acceleration, with the median FOMC forecast eying 3.1% Y/Y for 4Q25.
The White House has indicated that there won’t be an October CPI report.
Markets currently fully price 25bp cuts both on Wednesday and then at the next meeting in December before a subsequent cut in March. A June cut is then seen as more likely than not but with less conviction behind it following weekend optimistic headlines concerning US-China trade tensions.