FED: KC's Schmid: Appropriate To Hold Rates; Eying Smaller Balance Sheet

Feb-11 16:29

KC Fed President Schmid (not a 2026 FOMC voter) continued to convey a hawkish monetary policy view in a speech Wednesday, and we continue to believe he's among a sizeable minority on the FOMC who don't have rate cuts as part of their 2026 baseline. In short, "With demand outpacing supply and inflation running closer to 3% than 2%, I see it as appropriate to maintain a somewhat restrictive policy stance."

  • He says that after cutting rates, Fed policy is "arguably no longer restraining activity all that much, if at all. As I’ve said before, I think it is best to judge whether interest rates are restrictive or accommodative based on how the economy performs. With growth showing momentum and inflation still hot, I’m not seeing many indications of economic restraint....further rate cuts risk allowing high inflation to persist even longer." Unsurprisingly, in a post-speech Q&A he said that the January Employment Report was "good news" (as quoted by Bloomberg).
  • Schmid weighs in on the recently-hot topic of productivity and its impact on the inflation outlook. He sounds skeptical that recent gains are AI-led, instead pointing to a "falloff in labor market churn" and household and business investment demand keeping growth strong.
  • In the end, he asks, "Is growth being led by supply or demand? With so many competing but intertwined developments, it can be hard to tell. But we do have one reliable indicator that can cut through all the confusion and provide a quick answer. That is inflation. Overall, with inflation still running hot, it appears that demand is outpacing supply across much of the economy. I remain open to the possibility, and I’m even optimistic, that AI and other innovations will eventually lead to a non-inflationary, supply-driven growth cycle. However, based on the current rate of inflation, we are not there yet."
  • He comments on recent balance sheet decisions too, supportive of decisions to roll off MBS holdings and shorten the duration of the SOMA portfolio. He's been one of the most ardent advocates on the FOMC of reducing the Fed's market footprint. It's perhaps of increasing importance now though, given that the nominated/incoming Fed Chair Warsh has signaled that he'd like to shrink the balance sheet.
  • Schmid: "it is my view that in normal times the Fed’s balance sheet should not influence the shape of the yield curve. The balance sheet growth initiated in December is reducing this distortion by concentrating new purchases in Treasury bills. In shortening the average maturity of our holdings, the FOMC is continuing to reduce the influence of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet on longer-term interest rates" and "winding down our mortgage holdings is critical to ensuring that the Fed minimizes its footprint in financial markets".
  • He does signal support for regulatory changes and other factors that could structurally reduce reserve demand and thus lower the size of the asset side of the Fed's balance sheet: "I think there are opportunities to reduce reserve demand over time, especially as the regulatory environment and payments technologies continue to evolve. Guiding towards a lower level of reserves is not only feasible in my opinion, but something that should be pursued to allow for a smaller balance sheet."

Historical bullets

SONIA OPTIONS: M6 Call Spread Buyer

Jan-12 16:29

SFIM6 96.65/96.75 call spread, bought for 3 in 10k

US: GOP Senator Murkowski Backs Tillis' Hold On Fed Nominees

Jan-12 16:18

Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) has issued a statement on X backing Republican colleague Thom Tillis's (R-NC) opposition to the Department of Justice's criminal investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell. 

  • Murkowski wrote, "After speaking with Chair Powell this morning, it’s clear the administration’s investigation is nothing more than an attempt at coercion. If the Department of Justice believes an investigation into Chair Powell is warranted based on project cost overruns—which are not unusual—then Congress needs to investigate the Department of Justice. The stakes are too high to look the other way: if the Federal Reserve loses its independence, the stability of our markets and the broader economy will suffer. My colleague, Senator Tillis, is right in blocking any Federal Reserve nominees until this is resolved."
  • Tillis said in a statement earlier that he would use his position on the Senate Banking Committee to derail the confirmation of Powell's yet-to-be-named successor, “I will oppose the confirmation of any nominee for the Fed—including the upcoming Fed Chair vacancy—until this legal matter is fully resolved.” Assuming no Democrats voted in favour of a hypothetical nominee, Tillis's vote would be sufficient to block Trump's nomination from advancing to a confirmation vote. 

FED: Second GOP Senator Threatens To Hold Up Fed Nomination Over Powell Inquiry

Jan-12 16:17

US Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), posts on X, "After speaking with [Fed Chair Jerome] Powell this morning, it’s clear the administration’s investigation is nothing more than an attempt at coercion. If the Department of Justice believes an investigation into Chair Powell is warranted based on project cost overruns—which are not unusual—then Congress needs to investigate the Department of Justice. The stakes are too high to look the other way: if the Federal Reserve loses its independence, the stability of our markets and the broader economy will suffer. My colleague, Senator Tillis, is right in blocking any Federal Reserve nominees until this is resolved."

  • In a statement published on 11 Jan, retiring Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) said, “I will oppose the confirmation of any nominee for the Fed — including the upcoming Fed Chair vacancy — until this legal matter is fully resolved”.
  • When it comes to replacing Powell at the end of his term in May, President Donald Trump's eventual nominee will need to be confirmed in a majority vote in the Senate. With Murkowski and Tillis expressing their intention to hold the process up, it would only take two more Republicans to break ranks to erase Majority Leader Sen. John Thune (R-SD)'s majority.
  • Last week, five GOP senators voted with Democrats on a War Powers Resolution vote related to Venezuela. While the issue is entirely separate from the Fed, the fact that Republican leadership cannot be assured of a majority in the Senate on contentious issues presents risks to the administration's plans for the Fed from May onwards.