CANADA DATA: Canada March Jobless Claims +0.4%, First Rise Since November

Thedeen’s speech suggests the Riksbank isn’t currently in a rush to raise interest rates, and thus supports a rate hold on May 7. However, as noted at the March decision, there is clearly vigilance with respect to upside inflation risks. We consider Thedeen to be on the more hawkish side of the Executive Board alongside Seim. 

He outlines three potential policy responses to the Iran war, similar to ECB President Lagarde a few weeks ago:

1. “One option is to ‘wait and see’. This seems a fairly reasonable approach if uncertainty is high and the duration of the supply disruption is still unclear.
2. “Another option is to raise interest rates relatively sharply as a precautionary measure.”…. “One problem with this strategy is that if the shock has already subsided and inflation has begun to fall back before the interest rate increase has an impact, there is a risk that monetary policy will be sharply contractionary in a situation where the economy instead needs support.”
3. “A third option is to raise the interest rate, but to a relatively limited extent. This gives the central bank room to manoeuvre to assess how the economy is reacting, both to the shock itself and to the interest rate adjustment, before taking the next step.”…. “In practice, the difference between this approach and the ‘wait and see’ strategy is not very large. It is mostly a question of how quickly and how clearly the central bank signals that it is ready to act, given the uncertainty regarding the size and duration of the shock”

On the similarities and differences of the current shock relative to 2022, Thedeen references:

• The currency policy setting (1.75% policy rate vs 0% in 2022 + QE)
• The development of the krona (depreciating in 2022)
• Resource utilisation (higher than usual in 2022)
• Fiscal policy (more expansionary today vs 2022)
• The impact of the recent high inflation episode on current inflation perceptions. 

The downside revision to German growth forecasts reported earlier will impact Finance minister Klingbeil's 2027 budget proposal (expected for next week, around April 29) as well as later bi-annual tax estimates (to be published around May 7, latest update from October here). All else equal, lower growth means lower taxes but also more favourable business cycle buffer calculations in terms of debt brake limits.

• Recapping, "German output is set to grow by 0.5% this year, the Economy Ministry in Berlin said Wednesday. That compares with a January projection for a 1% expansion. The ministry also revised its outlook for next year down to 0.9% from 1.3%", Bloomberg quotes an emailed statement from the German economy ministry.
• These government forecasts now sit below both the median sellside analyst forecast we track (0.6% for 2026, -0.4pp from a month ago), and a set of recently published public sector forecasts from a) the IMF (0.8% 2026, 1.3% 2027, both figures down 0.3pp since January) and b) a joint one from German institutes (0.6% 2026, 0.9% 2027, down 0.7pp and 0.5pp since last autumn). For a full writeup of these views see here.

+15,000 SFRM6 96.34 (+0.010), post time offer at 0834:12ET, lead quarterly remains offered there.