Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari, a 2026 FOMC voter, sounds patient on the prospect of future rate cuts in comments made Monday on CNBC. Overall based on his first remarks since the December FOMC meeting, we would continue to characterize his stance as just the 3rd most hawkish of this year's 4 rotating presidential voters (less hawkish than Cleveland's Hammack and Dallas's Logan, more hawkish than Philly's Paulson). Back in November he said that he wouldn't have supported the October rate cut, and we assume this meant he didn't support December's cut either.
- It sounds like if early-2026 inflation tariff passthrough from businesses does not prove to be too alarming, then he could plausibly support further cuts because there is a risk that unemployment could "pop" higher going forward.
- But he's also in no hurry to ease because the labor market looks relatively steady amid a consistently more resilient economy than had been expected, inflation remains too high, and he sees policy as around neutral already. Indeed he implies that the scope for cuts is limited and that he wouldn't rule out support for the next move being a hike depending on how the data unfolds.
- "The economy has proven to be far more resilient than I had expected...that tells me monetary policy must not be putting that much downward pressure on the economy. My guess is we’re pretty close to neutral right now." On balancing the Fed's dual mandate risks, Kashkari says that the FOMC needs to see more data before determining which of the inflation or the labor market mandates is at bigger risk of being missed, and then "move from a neutral stance whatever direction is necessary" (note the "direction" appears to be a matter of debate for him).
- He says "I think the inflation risk is one of persistence, that these tariff effects take multiple years to work their way all the way through the system, whereas I do think there's a risk that the unemployment rate could pop from here...We have two sides of our mandate... inflation is slowly trending down. The unemployment rate has gone from 3.6% to 4.6% so we're moving in the wrong direction on the labor market."
- Kashkari's outlook on the economy appears to consist of more-of-the-same on growth and the labor market. But he also echoes comments from other FOMC members in scrutinizing whether businesses will pass through tariffs to clients via price resets at the start of the year. He characterizes the main inflation debate on the FOMC as whether tariff-related price increases are persistent or a one-off.
- On inflation, "I've got a lot of confidence that housing services inflation... should continue to come down. Non housing services should be tied to wages, and wage growth is slowly trending down, so it's going to be slow... the tariff induced goods inflation - are we going to see a repricing in January of this year? A lot of businesses have said, there could be a repricing this year as they reset prices, that's something that we're going to need to watch."
- On growth, Kashkari reiterates that it keeps "surprising me how resilient growth is, and my expectation is the economy will probably continue doing what it's been doing, which is pretty resilient, pretty decent growth." On the labor market: "My expectation has continued low hiring but low firing."