EU CONSUMER CYCLICALS: VF Corp | 4Q (to March) earnings (x4)

May-21 16:21

(VFC: Ba1/BB) (equities -12%)

Focus will be on the fall in Vans (-20% rolling over -27% fall from last year - and nearly half the size it was at its peak/in 2022). It is pointing to Timberland that did its second straight quarter of double digit growth as evidence it knows how to do a turnaround: "as I said, we've demonstrated that we can do this at Timberland, for example, where we also had a period of decline"..."but we'll get there. We've done it in Timberland, we know how to do this, we just got to execute." Re Q1 guidance being down y/y (on EBIT) its flagging seasonality which skews it heavily to Vans (North Face is seasonal into the autumn/winter Q2/3). Otherwise all guidance is 'technically' credit positive including EBIT up, FCF up and paydown of 26s. Only negative is the continuing dividend which is not nice to see. Equities are not confident pricing growth here (13x on forward P/E, $5b market cap vs. $4.9b net debt) but stability will be enough for credit to log excess returns (trades wide). It will continue to trade high-beta on macro given Vans issues, we are still skewed to see this as turnaround story.

  • Vans down a sharp -20% mostly (60%) from purposeful pullback on unprofitable or unproductive channels/stores. It says excluding those it was down high-single digits (same as last quarters pace).
    • The pull back (including shutting of stores) does mean structurally lower revenue -> it is guiding to continued proportionate drag in Q1 and Q2 of this year (i.e. out to September).
    • Re. impact to group, Vans made up 25% of revenues last year and though it does not break out operating profit explicitly, it makes up most of the 'active' segment which is 16% of the adj. EBIT.
    • Sun Choe was lifted from Lululemon to fix this brand - the poaching itself caused a -7% slide in Lulu's stock. In late Jan mgmt said her work was yet to appear stating "I'm going to keep the expectations low for Vans as long as possible because I want to give her plenty of room to operate". Sentiment around her still optimistic.
  • $150m impact on costs from current tariffs if unmitigated but based on current timing of tariffs only 65% will be felt in FY26 (i.e. $98m). FY25 adj. EBIT guided to be up on this years $556m - and if so its <18% headwind. It says it can mitigate all of it through sourcing relocation and pricing actions.
  • FCF guidance is for it to be up y/y ($313m) - this excludes any non-core asset sales and will be driven by higher operating cash flows. No guidance on capex yet (LY: OCF $465m, capex $161m).
  • Not considering cutting the $35m/qtr ($140m/yr) dividend despite leverage (4.1x) holding outside 2.5x target.
  • Will pay down front €500m Mar-26s with a mix of FCF and/or drawing on the $2b revolver.

Historical bullets

US TSY FUTURES: BLCK: Jun'25 5Y Buy

Apr-21 16:01
  • +6,500 FVM5 108-16.25, buy through 108-15.75 post time offer at 1148:59ET, DV01 $267,000. The 5Y contract trades 108-15.75 last (+2.5)

PIPELINE: Corporate Bond Update: $5B Amex 4Pt Launched

Apr-21 15:57

Amex dropped the 6NC5 SOFR leg:

  • Date $MM Issuer (Priced *, Launch #)
  • 04/21 $5B #American Express $1.6B 4NC3 +98, $400M 4NC3 SOFR+126, $1.5B 6NC5 +108, $1.5B 11NC10 +128
  • 04/21 $700M Excelerate Energy 5NC2
  • 04/21 $2B QXO Inc. 7NC3 investor calls

FED: Citi: 125bp Cuts This Year, But Next One Pushed Back From May To June

Apr-21 15:42

Citi has pushed back its expectation for the next Fed rate cut to June, from May previously, as Fed officials "have guided against a May cut" amid government policy uncertainty.

  • They still expect 125bp of cuts this year, however, which is more than the just-under-100bp currently priced by Fed funds futures. Citi: "we expect a range of data to have pushed Fed officials more dovish by June. That would include weaker "soft" data (including PMI this week) and signs that the labor market is loosening with the unemployment rate rising in the next few jobs reports."
  • Citi shifted its 2025 view to 125bp of cuts immediately after the April 2 tariff announcements, from 75bp  - in both cases they had seen the next cut in May.
  • They note "risks are skewed to faster and/or deeper rate cuts" given that getting rates to around 3%, while close to where the FOMC sees longer-run neutral, is not "appropriately stimulative should financial conditions continue to tighten and the economy move closer to recession".
  • MNI is not aware of any analysts still expecting a cut at the May FOMC at this stage (decision announced May 7), with futures-implied pricing of a 25bp reduction at around 15%.