Chicago Fed’s Goolsbee (’25 voter) is hesitant to make a transitory argument for tariff-driven inflation, in contrast to Governor Waller, another FOMC participant at the dovish end of the spectrum, although it’s a view that’s seemingly shared by most of the committee after no apparent discussion at the May FOMC meeting. He sees surprisingly little tariff impact in data released so far but suggested that the April PCE data could be the last vestige of pre-tariff data.
- “If you only looked at official data you’d be behind the curve. So far we’ve had the last two months, excellent inflation reports but when we’re out talking to people they’re like just wait, just wait, we haven’t seen it yet but the tariffs are coming. So we’ve got to have a little bit of anticipation.”
- “I would say surprisingly little direct impact so far in the data that’s coming out. We don’t know if that will remain true for the next month or two.”
- “PCE inflation […] the backward looking average over the past year is 2.1% Y/Y so it’s pretty close. […] I think that’s the last vestige [of pre-tariff data]. I think these last months of inflation look pretty good to me. They’re why I thought underneath this thing was looking decent on dual mandate grounds.”
- “The more sophisticated thing that we’ve got to decide is if something raised prices, one time and stopped raising them […] econ 101 would say it’s a one-time impact. If you think that’s a transitory shock to inflation, there is a sense in which you should just ignore it when setting monetary policy. [But] We learned the last time around this thing hit the supply chain. […] I’m a little gun shy about making that argument again.”