
Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh could lead the FOMC to lower interest rates before the end of the year if energy-related inflation subsides fairly quickly and inflation expectations remain contained, former Fed board governor Randall Kroszner told MNI.
“If inflation expectations stay very well anchored, and he can convince other people around the table on the timing and extent of the AI impact, I think they'll either be on hold or they will have a cut as the next action,” said Kroszner, a professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, in an interview.
“Will it be in the next three months? No. Will it be potentially in the last part of the year or the beginning of next year? That's what I would say.”
Kroszner is quite sanguine on the inflation outlook, believing worries that U.S. tariffs would lead to global trade wars were overstated given U.S. leverage over energy markets. He is also heartened by the rapid decline in oil prices at the first hint of a resolution to the Iran war, and thinks the dampening effects from lower shelter costs on the inflation rate will continue.
“I see the impact of the war in Iran as being something that could be interpreted more as a one-off. What we’ve seen is the incredible flexibility in energy prices. They did move up rapidly but when there was a ceasefire signed they fell to where they went pre-war,” he said.
“So I don’t anticipate that there’ll be much pressure in the monthly inflation numbers starting in a few months and you will also have Kevin I think gradually convincing people that the AI productivity impact is not only real but substantial.” (See MNI INTERVIEW: Fed Will Be On Hold As Oil Shock Unwinds-Levy)
TASK FORCES
Kroszner is encouraged by the announcement of prominent economists and macro thinkers to Warsh’s five task forces, and by his already visible stamp on the Fed’s communications approach.
“These are all excellent well-known people who are very much independent thinkers and are not being drawn from one particular school of thought or point of view. This illustrates that Kevin is not trying to push one agenda but really trying to draw on the best thinking,” he said.
Kroszner said that revisiting key measures of inflation and which ones the Fed emphasizes is a legitimate exercise given large structural changes in the economy, and could lead to a renewed emphasis on trimmed-mean measures.
COMMUNICATIONS BALANCE
Warsh will have to strike the right balance between pulling back on forward guidance while still ensuring enough Fed communication to allow the market to properly price in the central bank’s reaction function.
“Many economists think that having some form of guidance and having clarity in the reaction function helps to reduce volatility and potentially helps the markets do the work for the Fed or make it easier for the Fed to get to its goals because the market will know where it’s going and sort of move in that direction,” said Kroszner.
“That said, the optimal amount of communication is not talking about every data point that comes out and having 15-20 people do that. Kevin really does feel that the Fed got itself into some hot water by making commitments that it couldn’t keep,” he added.
“A lack of clarity in communication about what the Fed was doing for monetary policy purposes versus crisis management, market function purposes was one of the things that got the Fed to buy far more assets than they otherwise would have purchased following Covid. And that dramatic growth of the balance sheet was a contributing factor to the high inflation that we had.”